"ptak appreciates old racecars" (racecarptak)
05/09/2014 at 05:45 • Filed to: buick wildcat ii
3
5|
"ptak appreciates old racecars" (racecarptak)
05/09/2014 at 05:45 • Filed to: buick wildcat ii | 3
| 5 |
The 1954 Buick Wildcat II.
It's got a very agile, athletic look while still retaining a distinctly American style. That and the throwback to 1930s-style fenders and the windshield-mounted driving lights.
davedave1111
> ptak appreciates old racecars
05/09/2014 at 06:52 |
|
I wouldn't say beautiful is the right word, although I like it. There's something a bit too masculine about the wide shoulders for it to be beautiful.
|
ptak appreciates old racecars
> davedave1111
05/09/2014 at 07:02 |
|
Masculine can be beautiful ;) though I see what you mean.
|
davedave1111
> ptak appreciates old racecars
05/09/2014 at 07:24 |
|
Generally masculine things are considered handsome rather than beautiful. The latter implies feminine qualities.
|
ptak appreciates old racecars
> davedave1111
05/09/2014 at 07:48 |
|
Agree to disagree? I think beautiful is a term which can be applied to anything which looks very good, handsome separated from beautiful seems like a social construct to avoid men being called beautiful and vice-versa.
|
davedave1111
> ptak appreciates old racecars
05/09/2014 at 08:53 |
|
All language is a social construct, by its very nature. You can mean what you like by a word, but it doesn't change what others will understand when you use it.
There's no reason a man can't be beautiful. It just means that he's at least slightly feminine in his good looks, rather than being ruggedly and entirely masculine.